> TRIP the traveler observed before him the path which remained seven steps he could place each step to the ground before him in his mind seven final paces forward seven final paces to savor as his last how many final breaths can be drawn in seven steps? how many thoughts can be acknowledged? how high can one draw the knee and how slow can one retract the foot to make each step constitute an eternity? he looked to his left and to his right and finally he looked with apprehension to the path behind him the two men in armor flourishing immaculately maintained blades motioned toward the traveler to continue forward as any decision to do otherwise would result in the obvious the traveler hesitated to take his initial step toward the edge of the cliff his mind betrayed his emotions and forced him to recall again the cause of his impending demise he was urged to shout to the guards "i am of innocence i am made of the same earth as you by the potter as were you allow me please to turn the other way and travel where i am called to travel you will see me not again and all i was ever and all i could ever be would exist no more to anyone" but the traveler knew such words would only anger the guards as they were similar in heart and origin but distant in circumstance and it is circumstance favorable or otherwise that dictates the motions of a blade when all other factors are made to be put aside it was too late rationalized the traveler it was too late to change the minds of the two enforcers twenty years of belief and comfort can not be off put in seven meager paces the traveler facing forward heard the nearing steps of the two men as they grew impatient with the traveler's hesitation to do what the gods required of him to do the traveler before taking his first step forward made one decision a final decision the only decision he could make at such a time he made the decision to control the only thing he could control his mind he would with each coming step unshackle the weight of which time placed upon his shoulders he would defy in his heart the men who ordered him to march forward and feel not pious nor defeated as he paced forward the traveler took his first step forward KRONOS this step was the largest the most fearless it was taken without nausea it was taken as if by a merchant with little risk and everything to gain it was taken with the certainty that only follows the initial decision his second step trembled as it hit the rocky ground DIAS this step was taken by the foot of a giant unsteady but none the less confident in direction ARIS the third step did swing with the weight of confidence a breath of completion as if the air was no longer a necessity this third step hit the ground with the kinetic prowess of a warrior who had moments before lost everything and realized there was nothing any longer to hold him back this step pushed forward his fourth APHRODITE with the far motion of the pendulum comes a far motion in the opposite direction the traveler felt the pain of his love the tenderness of each caress and the softness of her voice he suffered by her innocence and gratitude toward him but just as he walks now he did then from her and as he recalls her now he sees her differently she smiles to him as a ghost of a memory ERMIS the fifth step toward the sudden drop off was quick and abrupt as his mind lingered at the thought of the beauty of love his heart was light and his mind was calm in the way only compassion can cool such a fever but he thought of all he was leaving behind unfinished stones as they appear a legacy of wandering he thought to himself a legacy of removed relationships and barren land he was leaving nothing behind and as the thought of that settled into his mind he smiled for the first time in many weeks SELENE this step his second to final echoed with darkness it was a hollow step where the inevitable conclusion rolled through the very essence of his being his final step was all he could see the light of it's image illuminated this step he could see only now the end and knew his next step would rest not upon solid ground he looked back at his life as only one can do in the darkness the fears the joys the triumphs all woven together in an uneven quilt with patterns that fought with the others and colors that failed to compliment each other he observed this quilt not with weary eyes or judgmental eyes it was his quilt his story he took this quilt and wrapped himself in it before taking the final step he was no longer the traveler in torn clothing he saw himself in the physical now as the archetype he had become in the story he had woven together HELIOS the heart of the cause was before him his final breath was not a final breath but another breath a release and a drawing in of what he needed no longer and what he desired but what he desired wasn't life or vitality he desired the air the way it feels to inhale and exhale as if nothing further could possibly matter he noticed now a sweetness to the air he had never before observed the air carries within it the essence of the land below it and the heavens above it how wonderful in every aspect of the word the traveler thought as he took with certainty and completion his final step...............
> but consider the man who takes too big a bite of his cereal and finds himself peering down at his cold body below for only a moment until he wakes up again in the correct perspective confused as to why his friend kicked his back in so hard this poor fellow much as the robed man in the flammarion engraving caught a glimpse of and opened the door to but did not walk through the firmament what ever that may be but what is clear is that he remains on this side as opposed to the other but at such a time the man faces a dilemma of character or possibly the consequence to the lack thereof does he take from his experience a opportunity to kiss his kisses and love his loves more? does he hold it within and let such emotions of confusion and suspended belief escape only during moments when the script of modern life is folded neatly and set aside? does he proclaim to whomever he can proclaim to that his experience was unique and that he is capable of answering every esoteric question as well as those he makes up when the mailbag becomes empty? does he deny the experience ever happened as it fights with his beliefs or disbeliefs and does he take action accordingly? it seems when we peek through the firmament and see what we shouldn't we do one of such things the hero's journey can be a mountain climb a day dream a trip and fall or even a crusade...... depending on who has the chance luck or burden to see through the foggy window and ride the weight of the life that lead them so far so soon.
the word FIRMAMENT when used religiously describes the membrane created by god which separates the waters above from the waters below the heavens from the earth a thin separative material of divine creation where a wanderer could so if he chose to be half in the heavens and half upon the earth much as the artists of the time depicted but in such depictions the earth is pictured flat and the angels simply wait going about their business on the other side of the firmament but as science progressed the concept of the firmament faded into obscurity much as did the flat earth what remains however is the notion of a traveler being in two places at once one divine and one mortal half in the heavens and half upon the earth but can something or someone be split evenly in mind or body? completely even not more one than the other and aware of the distinct bi location of sorts? water at 211 degrees fahrenheit is incredibly hot however at 212 degrees fahrenheit it is boiling and producing steam the firmament is crossed as in all or nothing something is either completed or left in an unfinished state while those on the other side of the firmament are amused by the perpetual toiling
DEVOTION billionaires sending someone else into space to vicariously peer down at a spent planet so the thought is then who will be first to successfully commercialize the big black nothing? who will be first to be second? where do you go next after you're the first or second? space goes on and on for unimaginable distances deeper thank the most expensive glass eyes can see some look up at the stars with wonderment and awe when the light of the sun fades below the horizon and some practice the same motions but instead view the stars as the digits following the operating expense ledger of their favorite shares they twitch and sweat with a nervous sense of having the upperhand for the moment but as the stars slowly drift along the dark sky they remind themselves time is money so it would be best then to look down not up at what has already been conquered and refined.
___ the old man carved the impersonal stone with simple tools while the air ached around him from the noise that emanated from everywhere the old man would complain to his masters of the pain in his knees as the noise would swell but his tongue was not the same as theirs or so he was told though such truths dispensed by his masters were as plentiful as the rocks that held up his weary feet masters he reasoned gods as they portrayed themselves would surely show no fear in the presence of a humble and weak specimen but he observed accident of expression of such a god when the mask of ceremony was unfavorably removed the tired old man said aloud for the first time ever as he set down his tools GOD DOES NOT COUGH ___ at what point does a myth revert back to a history? how long does the transformation take? who oversees the process? who abhors the process? and who looks the other way?
> who has the advantage if the lights are cut? a man who has lived in the same house for fifteen years? or a man who has spent the last thirty minutes in the darkness? while the dignified party stumbles to the light switch and feels about for it's whereabouts unknowing if the electricity has been affected or not the rods in the eyes of the man who spent thirty minutes in complete darkness are well adjusted for the absence of light and he is able to see the room and the movements of the currently sightless man in perfect clarity and he knows where the confused man is headed tired eyes read the same words and form the same pictures within the the mind to understand what has already been understood by tired eyes before how many times does ' the ' appear in the above sentence? the element of surprise floats above the crest of the wave of randomness right? if so then who is surprised? who is surprising?
he says to you while pretending to remain uninterested "i see what you are saying our galaxy is vast in size and breadth as well as immensely old nearly three times the age of our planet yes and our sun that keeps us warm night and day is much younger than many of the other stars that do much the same to even more planets similar to ours all across the galaxy drake wrote out a beautiful equation to estimate life while fermi pondered why no one out there cared to send him a letter and as time does progress we seem to be adding zeros to the ends of the previous estimates concerning the amount of communicative extraterrestrial civilizations in our galaxy this growing number coupled with the previous statement regarding the advanced age of many other star systems in our galaxy as well as the relatively brief amount of time it takes for a population to spread across the galaxy should it follow an exponential growth pattern it seems more probable than not that we are the ignored and not the alone and for all good reason one would think but you did not answer my question i wanted to know what you think of ufos" you now share the same expression as your sly friend you feel validated that he follows your line of reason and that he seems agreeable to the notion we are not alone in all of space but even he the quiet rational friend is prompting you to define your BELIEF not as you THINK of ufos....... you know the statement he is waiting on the chokehold that has him an engine can only burn the fuel it was designed to burn and you are denying him of that but it does suddenly come to your mind the meaning of all this and your frustration when the script of modern life is set aside it always is picked back up and when it is picked back up the play returns to the act that proceeds the previous prior to the brief intermission where we smiled stretched our arms and wondered what was going on backstage a conversation outside the script eventually falls victim to that small compulsion to return to our seats when the lights flicker three times before the curtains rise again thought reverts to belief and belief fuels defensive recourse when a belief of an opposing nature or even neutral but differing nature is encountered so you now walk away from your friend and wish him an enjoyable lunch break as he heads to the water cooler and you consider the study of the probability concerning life elsewhere in the galaxy....... and ufos no ufology ufologists it might as well be ufoism at this point you think to yourself....... while studious individuals who are interested in the phenomenon commit themselves to quiet and unbroken circles there are a vastly greater number of self anointed fools who shout in a cringe worthy sort of way either delusion beliefs concerning the question of ufos or contrived pseudo-beliefs to entice a willing percentage to place a few coins in the human hand that somehow finds itself buried under extravagant robes and peculiar symbols however outside of this small percentage is a larger percentage observing the great comedy who goes to the car race for the winning car? and who goes to the same race for the crash? who buys the tabloid magazine because they believe their favorite celebrity is fathering an extraterrestrial child? and who buys the magazine because it is hilarious? so we sit now within our hypothetical scenario within a hypothetical scenario at the empty party where nobody showed up the flies are beginning to circle the fruit bowl on the counter and the cake is looking awfully stale so you wonder to yourself why am i ignored? why do i sit alone when i mailed invitations and tied balloons to the mailbox? so you contrive in your mind the reason and sell it to yourself but your phone begins to ring remember? and you sit in silence as it rings waiting for the right thought or story to appear in the theater of your mind.
but ignored..... why would we be the ignored? we light such bright fires and send metal capsules into space could it be the party doing the ignoring is carrying on with such because they know us and have observed us? but a clever man then would say "while they ignore us we are coming closer to the reality of space colonization riding the exponential wave of progress and growth it would be illogical to think there are visiting civilizations from elsewhere as such a civilization would surely know that our civilization is headed to the stars in but a brief moment and when we are doing as we do on a larger scale we will do just that they would surely have had a vested interest to make peace with us by now" but another clever man at this point could argue also "such a premise would imply that we are special that we are unique to be the only civilization who has ever reached this point of achievement and thus needs to be put in place or made notice of to ensure the further safety of the visiting party" a space faring civilization that has observed the progress of many other civilizations would likely have a standard protocol for encountering civilizations who are yet locked to their planet of origin and behave in a violent manner could it be to the passersby that we are then nothing unique in our development and existence? and that our yearning for the stars coupled with our aggressive tendencies as a civilization is nothing more than a reoccurring theme that is observed frequently? then what would be the recourse of such a civilization that encounters this little planet and the peoples who call it home? could it be they are morally righteous and feel that we as a primitive society are children and should be left unharmed but in observation as such? but what of other civilizations who are capable of space travel? there surely cannot be just one civilization aware of this planet and it's inhabitants if one reviews the probabilities and data regarding exponential growth why then hasn't a rogue group of traveling visitors made graffiti upon our capitols and claimed for themselves our lands? is there an agreement that keeps us as the ignored? your friend who has been sitting bored and despondent breaks his silence............
and your friend who asked you what you thought of ufos sits there now wondering when lunch will be delivered....... but you continue while he feigns his hunger......
how long would it take to colonize the galaxy? while debates were raging in scientific circles concerning the reality or fallacy of extraterrestrial civilizations an astrophysicist in 1975 michael hart proposed in a paper that it would take only two million years for a civilization to colonize the galaxy with the stop watch starting the moment the civilization becomes spacefaring and the stop watch concluding once each stellar system in the galaxy has in it's gravitational pull a representative body of the civilization two million years seems vast by our standards but considering the galaxy is estimated to be nearly 14 billion years old and considering as well the galaxy is estimated to house somewhere between 100 and 400 billion stars the two million years seems minute compared to the amount of work that would have to be completed with regard to the time frame of both the colonization and the age of the galaxy even an estimate of 100 million years would seem small impressive numbers all around following his initial thesis mr. hart himself asked the same question enrico fermi did "where is everybody?" mr. hart concluded that since we have no proof of extraterrestrial visitation coupled with his notion that space colonization can be achieved rather quickly in the grand scheme of things that we simply are alone we are the first civilization to leave our planet's atmosphere in the whole galaxy this means obviously no other civilizations are interstellar travelers if they were we would have long since known about it due to the vast amount of space peoples that would have already occupied this area of space but his response requires an assumption doesn't it? that requires the assumption that an extraterrestrial civilization would want to make itself known to us while traveling and going about their business and considering the large numbers what seems more probable? the scenario that we are the first civilization in the galaxy to reach a level where space colonization is near to become a reality? or the scenario that out of the enormous amount of star systems in the galaxy and the vast age of many other star systems in the galaxy and the relatively short span it takes to traverse the galaxy that we are not alone as an intelligent civilization but instead that we are ignored by all the other civilizations that have achieved space colonization? consider for a moment yourself as an alien to this civilization and planet a brief observation from the safety of this planet's atmosphere many thousands of years ago would reveal the primal urges the peoples contend with that are magnified by a series of isolation techniques based upon perceived differences in short the peoples of this planet have a history of attacking other peoples of this planet who are perceived to be different in some way or another this would appear to be a violent bunch of primitives by the estimate of an observer and i would have to agree with that observation regardless of the cause behind such immense violence and apathy innocents die each day because they are that incredibly hungry and devastating wars with atrocious weapons are fought in a perpetual sort of manner if i were such an alien in the atmosphere of this planet observing thousands of years ago or even in modern times i would conclude that this planet's civilization would pose an immediate threat to the well being of myself and my companions i would conclude that it is most reasonable to avoid contact with such a civilization and surely be cautious so as to not become spotted by the little devils but..... a problem occurs with this line of thinking also not in the immediate by any means but in the long term because in about two million years this violent civilization will have had ample time to establish itself in the greater galaxy...... so regarding this question and the problem it advances if one considers the probability of civilizations elsewhere in the galaxy and the probability that some of such civilizations in their travels have been made aware of or have witnessed firsthand the civilization that currently occupies this planet why hasn't this violent civilization been permanently dealt with by now to preserve the safety of the rest of the galaxy? two million years is only a day trip in term of all things galactic it is only a matter of time before our civilization finds itself spanning many star systems taking with us all of our destruction and baggage why weren't we dealt with when we were more primitive? that would have been most efficient by our modes of thinking but then again we are the violent ones..... in current times we are much more dangerous and the range of our destruction is far greater than it has ever been and this magnitude and this range are both only getting stronger and larger exponentially so why are we ignored? that is the next question one would ask should they find themselves ignored and not simply alone...................
so the age of our sun it is currently impossible to look at a star and define it by age as we do so often with other things in life but the age of a star can be gleaned from the star's location in space the cluster it belongs to less accurately however by observing the brightness of the star to determine what phase the star is currently in lucky for life this is not highly accurate because a star spends nearly 90% of it's life in a relatively constant state of being converting hydrogen into helium the oldest stars in our galaxy are nearly 13 billion years old our sun in comparison is roughly 4.5 billion years old stars of this size generally have a life expectancy of 10 billion years spending a great deal of that time slowing increasing in size and temperature converting four hydrogen atoms into two helium atoms with all that being said our sun came into existence around 4.5 billion years ago while many other stars began as far back as 13 billion years ago now not all of these stars or binary systems may be conducive toward the formation of life around them due to a plethora of reasons some reasons as obvious as the absence of planet bodies but as we have observed from the drake equation one percent of one hundred is one however one percent of one million is ten thousand if one takes the most modest of the projections stemming from the drake equation such as the 12,000 active intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations in the galaxy as determined initially by frank drake himself how many of these civilizations belong to a star system out of the estimated 100 billion solar systems in our galaxy that has been in business longer than has our star? how many years do these civilizations have over our civilization? a great deal of advancement can occur within just 100 years this growth is exponential so long as it's demand for energy can be met what about a civilization that has one billion years on us? what about more than one billion? what if we consider a number substantially larger than drake's initial run of the statistics such as the numbers proposed by scientists more recently? the probability value of other civilizations existing elsewhere in the galaxy is higher than the probability value of our civilization being the only civilization in the galaxy and from observing the amount of stars in our galaxy especially those that are much older than our sun the probability value of there existing civilizations older than our civilization in the galaxy is higher than the probability value of our civilization being the oldest of all the civilizations in the galaxy now we get the stop watch out .............
this becomes the rhetorical question that defines the remainder of the dialogue are we the alone or are we the ignored? both are frightening in their own ways and implications but when we recall the probability value of life existing elsewhere beyond our planet's atmosphere versus the probability value of it not existing we begin to realize that the fruit dish is becoming moldy and the candles have long since burned out but the telephone just started ringing .............
"where is everybody?" asked the physicist enrico fermi while he and his colleagues continually discovered information that directly suggested the high probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the galaxy with many stars being much older than our star a high probability exists as well of life more intelligent than ourselves using a plethora of variables all multiplied together frank drake estimated the number of intelligent civilizations in our galaxy at 12,000 during his initial run of numbers the formula he developed is known as the drake equation and is still utilized by scientists today to estimate the number of intelligent civilizations in the galaxy carl sagan estimated this number a good deal higher at 1,000,000 of such civilizations some scientists today utilize the equation and settle on numbers up to nearly 50,000,000 civilizations during the initial meeting to discuss drake's work the participants utilized the formula along with other methods and reasoning to develop a maximum hypothesis of 100,000,000 civilizations in the galaxy this is profound considering the parameters drake set in place within his equation established the maximum number of civilizations in the galaxy at 50,000,000 with or without the hypothesizing of varying physicists and astronomers a casual observer can notice through even his own means that the probability value life exists elsewhere in this galaxy is more likely than the probability value that life does not exist outside of our planet's atmosphere especially considering how extraordinarily young our star is relative to other stars in the galaxy and fermi asked "where is everybody?" for good reason wouldn't you wonder the same thing if you and your colleagues were sifting through new information that suggested life is more common than it had been previously believed to be? after all a strong judeo-christian mindset has held an equally strong grip over the western world for upwards of two thousand years such a mindset is largely built upon the exclusivity of life on earth and a personal god who created man in his image as opposed to intelligent life throughout the universe and an impersonal god at best where life is a by product of proper conditions and honest statistics so where is everybody? this question can be asked in one of two ways in the first of such it is asked as one would ask their friends as they all walk alone through the forest during the quietest part of the night in the second of such it is asked as a host would ask himself at ten in the evening after realizing to his dismay that no one bothered to show up to his dinner party and what a bummer it is to feel that way ignored as opposed to alone ............
why don't we become employed by that question for a while? let's look at the subject logically in the truest definition of the word logic is defined by inexorable truth sound judgement investigation reason convincing forcefulness reliability can the fermi paradox be both right and wrong at the same time? that would surely make it a paradox......... how long would it take us from now should the stop watch start to colonize the galaxy? what if we started the stop watch five thousand years from now? what is the nature of growth concerning technological advancement? with all that said and everything else left unsaid what do we answer back with to our friend? before we say anything however we'd ought to remember drake's equation fermi and his friends and everyone else who asked a reasonable question in between we can address this subject logically and quite satisfyingly without the assistance of any UFOLOGY GURUS no need for any silly donations or speaking tours well maybe just a calculator lol .........
the script of modern life has had many authors and many editors as well as uncountable narrators of course but such an omnipresent meme that weaves in and out of culture and ages would surely fascinate the idle minds of curious observers when they find themselves coasting atop the foam of time instead i hear often from such minds of the moment their concerns with a celebrity's sexuality or what a shopkeeper should have done or shouldn't have done with their parking lot advertisements sometimes though a conversation floats off to a point we all can recognize this point where all the ego has worn off like a cereal box tattoo and the participants have nothing further to prove or add and even if they should have such a contribution it would fall upon ears that do not care enough to process the implications i refer to this as the peace pipe point of the conversation due to the universality of the calumet as well as the obvious catalyst for many of such discussions now at such a point and place in the conversation topics of actual interest tend to reveal themselves as modest musings or rhetorical questions at first the serious faces the required expression of one while reading the script of modern life do fade away now...... your friend who you thought dreamed in the form of spreadsheets surprises you with the question "what do you think of ufos......?" ........
the asch paradigm observant 911 operators in phoenix genetic homeostasis freedom from mind the balance of inaction and action psychologically ergonomic language the concrete nature of truth beliefs concerning beliefs sudden savant syndrome the corporeality of emotions and thoughts the ...oh wells...... continue i observe the script of modern life we all read when i lay my copy of it down it is just a script after all though a persistent one an old friend who only comes around when he wants something begins the conversation "hello good to see you and how are you?" and pauses while awaiting for you to follow also the script but should your copy of the script be out of eyesight it becomes easier to see the statement of "how are you doing?" as "i will pretend to listen through your response to my question until i hear you ask of me the same and at this point which was the point of me asking i will describe how upset and defeated i am currently in an attempt to receive from you a monetary tithe for the trouble of you hearing my woeful laments" and still the oh wells..... carry on.........
all live languages at this time share a commonality SIMPLIFICATION there is a gradual leaning in all modes of exchange toward refinement and condensation this is fueled by creating pathways shortcuts between points which itself is based upon the conservation of energy in the form of mental effort as mental effort is a draining thing which distracts the body from raw forms of consumable energy to be sought however to create pathways means to create by default rules of engagement to prevent this conservation of energy from causing CHAOS or entropy which builds upon the degradation of colliding objects but with all rules exceptions must be set along with precedents and with these bylaws come further rules as well as bodies to oversee and catalog the records of such the process of simplification is a process and byproducts of creating a process are stop signs green lights and meter maids but language all live languages are along the pendulum ride toward simplification to preserve energy mental and thus physical but language is the vessel of communication and in an age where nonverbal communication which statistically makes up over 90% of overall communication is removed through the use of technology to expedite the communication process a language that is becoming compacted loses the power it once had where an individual may have once traveled five miles to deliver a message the same individual now can send two words in one text message "love you.." to the lady he is amazed by communication is three dimensional and as language becomes increasingly less of volume communication is flattening to two dimensions literally what would a language you could physically hold portray of itself to the mind? would less of the initial message from the sender be decoded by the receiver? how many senses could be triggered by a language of such a type? how would this influence memory? what would a language of this type do with a mind that prefers to learn kinetically? what would this language look like?
there are four brothers on an airplane the sun is setting behind the desert landscape and the sky is clear of clouds as the airplane turns slightly it exposes the brothers' side of the airplane to the sunlight one brother reacts by pulling shut the curtain of his window exclaiming aloud how distracting the sunlight is to his reading one brother looks to the sunset but turns away and continues about his time as if it were an ordinary sight one brother does much the same but informs the other three of how nice the view is of the sun setting over the desert mesas one brother agrees with the latter brother and watches the sunlight as it fades away while being mindful of the travels he currently is having with his siblings and upon his arrival home he paints on a canvas the sunset he observed while in the company of his brothers
> a note to the observant before we talk about better things....... the nature of the ramblings of the gurus is predictable by definition as it swings no different than does a pendulum it has to again by definition as the pendulum swings right each of the gurus try to top each other with the most absurd claim but as a ceiling becomes reached by one in particular the pendulum must swing toward the left the momentum is directed back and forth and forth and back it has recently reached the far right and now the more cognizant of the herd take notice of this and position themselves to hop on and ride upon the swinging weight as it treks back the way from which it last came who has or possibly who have just pushed toward the highest reaches of the bizarre? who has or possibly who have just decried the thread of bizarreness they once supported for their own gain? foreseeably they will make the same decision again and for the same reason their own gain or more astutely put their own maintenance.......
and the boisterous billboards alongside the highway where they advertise themselves who picks up the trash for no compensation that piles beneath...? slappy
over the weekend i had some opportunity time and took a serious look into the world of the alternative media gurus this was the first time i invested such an amount of time since 2010 when i was incredibly bored and working at a college library i was only nineteen or twenty at the time and was immensely befuddled and amused by the antics of these gurus but now it's much less fascinating and instead deeply upsetting isn't it peculiar that most of these gurus proclaim themselves to be at a status equivalent of MERCURY? a messenger between the people and the gods a messenger between the masses and the truth cunning quick deceptive divinely justified........... no one could cross through the ancient trees without the oversight of mr. henry the strongman after he received your payment of gold anton made his choices because he believed beyond the use of the word that he was right and therefore all other opinions were not but the great normalcy bias does have an influence over the despondent and content audience as they peruse through the ramblings of their guru of choice the question which presents itself to me is quite simple if a guru whoever he or she may be believes to have been given a truth so revolutionary and so fantastic that the mere presence of such a truth gives energy to the spirit and vitality to all of humanity why would such a guru profit off the aroma of that truth withholding it from those who could benefit from it the most enticing those who can most easily afford it and positioning themselves as guardian or possibly captor of the truth but it becomes more complicated and upsetting what also about the gurus who are photocopies of gurus this is the most abundant variety...... such a guru of this stature does not even have anything shiny hidden in their hands but pretends and carries on as if what they have is even more shiny than that of whomever they are imitating ? i find this behavior to be upsetting and parasitic and i say this not to proclaim superiority or goodliness but to voice my indignation as just another EVERYMAN who finds music beautiful and deceit offensive while the gurus are occupied politicking for donations and posturing about who has the best relationship with the blonde aliens from across the galaxy....... there are honest people doing incredibly virtuous things at great expense to themselves one of the most apparent examples of an altruistic being is the 84 year old nun who broke through the fence of a nuclear facility there is an excellent interview of her posted here on the ct thread i am not speaking of her actions as i do not support anyone doing anything illegal but only of what she said to the judge upon sentencing "please have no leniency with me to remain in prison for the rest of my life would be the greatest gift you could give me" she went on to describe her inner peace during confinement with "beautiful women here who are my friends" i found her comments to be very enlightening and selfless it is the individuals who are of this mindset that are shadowed by the loud and destructive gurus who may preach of enriching humanity but do not live in accordance to such principles these gurus are easy to spot by default..........
advertising religion memetics aesthetics semantic memory can be understood together when firstly studying the eaton-rosen phenomenon heeaaddphoone
the last words of leonardo di ser piero da vinci "i have offended god and mankind by doing so little with my life"
RELEVANCE continued...... our psychological mechanism which determines data from the senses we deem relevant therefore worthy of being processed further versus that which is deemed irrelevant therefore discarded is often held at the mercy of other subconscious filters we do not realize we harbor why do we have a tendency to commit to memory the opinions of people who have already formed an opinion whereas we discard the words of people who have fragments of initial data? firsthand data raw the brain uses more energy when working as opposed to when it is docile preservation of self and energy is a natural tendency for obvious reasons the mind favors the path of least resistance one assumes through a trail of logic that states "since these minds have already done the work that my mind would have to have thought through i can say with safety that a correct conclusion has been drawn" it is a tendency also for a mind to believe that all other minds are just like itself consider march 13, 1997 in phoenix who thought to call the 911 operators and ask of them what calls they received? ............
good morning hello do you know why we say "hello" when we pick up the phone? mr. edison popularized the usage of the word "hello" which contrasted mr. bell's nautical phrase "ahoy" as a telephone greeting "hello" was used quite often before as a way of catching the attention of someone nearby before speaking but quickly became the standard way to answer the phone fascinating........ maybe anyway.. as those who know me know i am not interested in or enamored by most things of popular demand i do however find a condition known to affect just a few more fascinating than most anything else ACQUIRED SAVANT SYNDROME a man falls asleep and while resting receives a substantial head injury from a falling beam he wakes up two days later in the hospital speaking fluently a language that hasn't been spoken in years another man is doing electrical work at his home when he makes a poor decision and finds himself an excellent conductor of a hearty share of electricity when he comes again conscious he notices that in his mind's eye he can see complex shapes and intricate geometries he picks up a paint brush for the first time in years and paints a marvelous landscape to perfect scale when those years before the best he could paint would hardly be decipherable from his six year old daughter's art class painting that hangs on the fridge trauma and electrical shock as well as several other less common factors may trigger acquired savant syndrome and leave the newfound savant confused and befuddled as to where the sudden talent came from though it seems to the savant that it had been there the whole time as natural as speaking a primary language or writing one's name on a sheet of lined paper have you ever observed a friend who has never been a very talented singer but when in the presence of someone he finds lovely and with also the proper encouragement he goes up on the little stage and sings a proper karaoke of whatever song is popular at the time? ungodly stress will make the mother lift the minivan to save her child trapped under the wreckage a long succession of possibly unfounded compliments concerning the abilities of a struggling sales professional allows the young man to close the next five deals as if he were the top writer in the company can one acquire unknowingly the condition of a savant for only a moment? can said individual reacquire this condition again and again? can said individual then recognize the pattern and coach herself to attain "savanthood" for the particular trait on command? can this individual then later apply this ability to other traits? can this individual then become so fluent in being a savant at several different traits that they no longer require the process and simply switch to "savanthood" regarding any trait at any time? the mind is the closest thing to observable magic wouldn't you say? i find it peculiar that each of us have between our ears the world's most versatile expansive agile powerful intuitive receptive analytical processing machine known to all of man but how often do you observe someone wasting away their capabilities by staring blankly day after day at a television set? how often do you observe someone practicing ritualistically other actions that are defeatist by definition? i find it akin to being given a new maserati free of charge but then driving it no faster than a man walks and then proceeding to drive this powerful machine into every telephone pole alongside the road hummmmm.......................
what is more fragile? my opinion of you or your opinion of you? what makes it sway in the wind? what is the wind that makes it move? an opinion can be such a fickle thing or such a powerful thing i asked someone incredibly wise and balanced when i was young "what is life all about?" she gave me one word to understand our situations by RATINGS she did not elaborate and i still find it peculiar until i think back to opinions and what drives them or leaves them idle i hear often "you made me upset" or other such statements to and fro in observable conversations to make someone mad would mean giving such a person complete control over your emotions allowing such a person to put you in a state of mind that is unfavorable to your overall wellness how does that rate? lol
but a thoughtless choice had to be chosen at some point in order for it to repeat ad infinitum so an initial choice had to be chosen with all the power to choose itself in a repeating succession down the river which makes sense most especially if one studies RELEVANCE without looking draw the timepiece on your wrist now compare it to the actual thing i have yet to see anyone accurately depict their wristwatch they occasionally get the time correct in the drawing much the same with the overall shape but most omit the second hand or mistakenly write out numbers instead of roman numerals this timepiece for most individuals is checked several times an hour five days a week and quite often for a decade or more but considering this is something we spend a vast amount of cumulative time staring at surely we should know more than just the shape of the timepiece but the brain will only hold conscious what it deems to be relevant and if behaviors are dictated by beliefs and if beliefs are dictated by programming what do you deem relevant? WHY? cooldrink